[Bug target/112891] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] Missing vzeroupper insert.
liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Dec 7 06:13:50 GMT 2023
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112891
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao Liu <liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #2)
> (In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #1)
> > Aaused by r10-3477-g2a2e3a0dfcbe08, Can be fixed by revert the patch.
> >
> > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
> > @@ -15032,14 +15032,7 @@ ix86_avx_u128_mode_needed (rtx_insn *insn)
> > if (avx_upper_reg_found)
> > return AVX_U128_DIRTY;
> >
> > - /* If the function is known to preserve some SSE registers,
> > - RA and previous passes can legitimately rely on that for
> > - modes wider than 256 bits. It's only safe to issue a
> > - vzeroupper if all SSE registers are clobbered. */
> > - const function_abi &abi = insn_callee_abi (insn);
> > - if (vzeroupper_pattern (PATTERN (insn), VOIDmode)
> > - || !hard_reg_set_subset_p (reg_class_contents[SSE_REGS],
> > - abi.mode_clobbers (V4DImode)))
> > + if (vzeroupper_pattern (PATTERN (insn), VOIDmode))
> > return AVX_U128_ANY;
> >
> > return AVX_U128_CLEAN;
> Remove this regressed many testcases
>
> So it looks like we need to handle ix86_avx_u128_mode_after
>
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
> @@ -15177,7 +15177,14 @@ ix86_avx_u128_mode_after (int mode, rtx_insn *insn)
> bool avx_upper_reg_found = false;
> note_stores (insn, ix86_check_avx_upper_stores, &avx_upper_reg_found);
>
> - return avx_upper_reg_found ? AVX_U128_DIRTY : AVX_U128_CLEAN;
> + if (avx_upper_reg_found)
> + return AVX_U128_DIRTY;
> +
> + const function_abi &abi = insn_callee_abi (insn);
> + if (!hard_reg_set_subset_p (reg_class_contents[SSE_REGS],
> + abi.mode_clobbers (V4DImode)))
> + return AVX_U128_ANY;
> + return AVX_U128_CLEAN;
> }
Also for sibcall, we should return AVX_U128_CLEAN for
ix86_avx_u128_mode_needed.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list