[Bug middle-end/107389] Always propagate __builtin_assume_aligned
rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Oct 28 09:30:46 GMT 2022
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107389
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 53784
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53784&action=edit
prototype
This implements an -O0 fold-builtins pass. I've disabled some but not all
"optimizations" and instead of just throwing away __builtin_assume_aligned
I'm processing it at -O0 (the machinery from CCP relies on a lattice, with
optimization we should at least merge with the alignment info on the LHS).
On s390 I then see
foo:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
stmg %r11,%r15,88(%r15)
.cfi_offset 11, -72
.cfi_offset 12, -64
.cfi_offset 13, -56
.cfi_offset 14, -48
.cfi_offset 15, -40
aghi %r15,-176
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 336
lgr %r11,%r15
.cfi_def_cfa_register 11
stg %r2,168(%r11)
stg %r3,160(%r11)
lg %r1,160(%r11)
lpq %r2,0(%r1)
lg %r1,168(%r11)
stmg %r2,%r3,0(%r1)
lg %r2,168(%r11)
lmg %r11,%r15,264(%r11)
.cfi_restore 15
.cfi_restore 14
.cfi_restore 13
.cfi_restore 12
.cfi_restore 11
.cfi_def_cfa 15, 160
br %r14
.cfi_endproc
specifically I did not disable __atomic_add_fetch_* optimizations to
.ATOMIC_ADD_FETCH_CMP_0 and friends and also kept optimizing
stack_save/restore.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list