[Bug c++/107343] GCC accepts ill-formed out of class definition program

[jlame646 at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107343

--- Comment #1 from Jason Liam <jlame646 at gmail dot com> ---
The complete quote at the end of my original post is as follows:

> For a member function of a non-template class, the default arguments are allowed on the out-of-class definition, and are combined with the default arguments provided by the declaration inside the class body. If these out-of-class defaults would turn a member function into a default constructor or copy/move (since C++11) constructor/assignment operator, the program is ill-formed.