[Bug c++/104646] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cx_check_missing_mem_inits, at cp/constexpr.cc:845

cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Thu May 12 20:14:39 GMT 2022


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104646

--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
<jason@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a67bc6320d34b20fe838d479a6a1e110f1160c89

commit r11-9987-ga67bc6320d34b20fe838d479a6a1e110f1160c89
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Apr 14 15:34:14 2022 -0400

    c++: constexpr trivial -fno-elide-ctors [PR104646]

    The constexpr constructor checking code got confused by the expansion of a
    trivial copy constructor; we don't need to do that checking for defaulted
    ctors, anyway.

            PR c++/104646

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            * constexpr.c (maybe_save_constexpr_fundef): Don't do extra
            checks for defaulted ctors.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-fno-elide-ctors1.C: New test.


More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list