[Bug c++/104646] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cx_check_missing_mem_inits, at cp/constexpr.cc:845
cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Thu May 12 20:14:39 GMT 2022
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104646
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
<jason@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a67bc6320d34b20fe838d479a6a1e110f1160c89
commit r11-9987-ga67bc6320d34b20fe838d479a6a1e110f1160c89
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Apr 14 15:34:14 2022 -0400
c++: constexpr trivial -fno-elide-ctors [PR104646]
The constexpr constructor checking code got confused by the expansion of a
trivial copy constructor; we don't need to do that checking for defaulted
ctors, anyway.
PR c++/104646
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* constexpr.c (maybe_save_constexpr_fundef): Don't do extra
checks for defaulted ctors.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-fno-elide-ctors1.C: New test.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list