[Bug middle-end/105539] -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero happening too late?

qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Tue May 10 16:35:14 GMT 2022


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105539

qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I am a little confused:

with gcc -Wuninitialized -O1 (without -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero), there are
two issues:

1. the early uninitialized analysis didn't catch the uninitialized usage of y;


2. the ccp optimization deletes the if (z) statement completely:

[opc@qinzhao-aarch64-ol8 105539]$ cat t.c.034t.ccp1

;; Function x (x, funcdef_no=0, decl_uid=3591, cgraph_uid=1, symbol_order=0)

Removing basic block 3
Merging blocks 2 and 4
int x (int z)
{
  int y;

  <bb 2> :
  return 10;

}

are the above two bugs?


More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list