[Bug c++/104944] [9/10/11/12 Regression] incorrect alignas(void) accepted (with warning if templated)
cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Mar 25 14:15:32 GMT 2022
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104944
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek <mpolacek@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0b938a7612fb7acf1f181da9577235c83ede59e
commit r12-7815-gd0b938a7612fb7acf1f181da9577235c83ede59e
Author: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Mar 23 17:12:29 2022 -0400
c++: alignas and alignof void [PR104944]
I started looking into this PR because in GCC 4.9 we were able to
detect the invalid
struct alignas(void) S{};
but I broke it in r210262.
It's ill-formed code in C++:
[dcl.align]/3: "An alignment-specifier of the form alignas(type-id) has
the same effect as alignas(alignof(type-id))", and [expr.align]/1:
"The operand shall be a type-id representing a complete object type,
or an array thereof, or a reference to one of those types." and void
is not a complete type.
It's also invalid in C:
6.7.5: _Alignas(type-name) is equivalent to _Alignas(_Alignof(type-name))
6.5.3.4: "The _Alignof operator shall not be applied to a function type
or an incomplete type."
We have a GNU extension whereby we treat sizeof(void) as 1, but I assume
it doesn't apply to alignof, at least in C++. However, __alignof__(void)
is still accepted with a -Wpedantic warning.
We still say "invalid application of 'alignof'" rather than 'alignas' in
the
void diagnostic, but I felt that fixing that may not be suitable as part of
this patch. The "incomplete type" diagnostic still always prints
'__alignof__'.
PR c++/104944
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* typeck.cc (cxx_sizeof_or_alignof_type): Diagnose alignof(void).
(cxx_alignas_expr): Call cxx_sizeof_or_alignof_type with
complain == true.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp0x/alignas20.C: New test.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list