[Bug c++/106151] Inconsistent optimization when defaulting aggregate vs non-aggregate

[barry.revzin at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106151

--- Comment #2 from Barry Revzin <barry.revzin at gmail dot com> ---
I guess that's like:

C++11/14: neither is an aggregate (base class).
C++17: both are aggregates.
C++20: Bar is an aggregate, but Foo is not (user-declared constructor).

But that really shouldn't affect the code-gen here? (right???)