[Bug tree-optimization/105983] Failure to optimize (b != 0) && (a >= b) as well as the same pattern with binary and

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105983

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
On generic, what opimizes this is:
/* y == XXX_MIN || x < y --> x <= y - 1 */
(simplify
 (bit_ior:c (eq:s @1 min_value) (lt:s @0 @1))
  (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (@1))
       && TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (TREE_TYPE (@1)))
  (le @0 (minus @1 { build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (@1), 1); }))))

/* y != XXX_MIN && x >= y --> x > y - 1 */
(simplify
 (bit_and:c (ne:s @1 min_value) (ge:s @0 @1))
  (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (@1))
       && TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (TREE_TYPE (@1)))
  (gt @0 (minus @1 { build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (@1), 1); }))))
in match.pd when & is used instead of &&.