[Bug target/104271] New: 538.imagick_r run-time at -Ofast -march=native regressed by 26% on Intel Cascade Lake server CPU
jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Jan 28 17:12:15 GMT 2022
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104271
Bug ID: 104271
Summary: 538.imagick_r run-time at -Ofast -march=native
regressed by 26% on Intel Cascade Lake server CPU
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
Blocks: 26163
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-linux
Target: x86_64-linux
On our Intel Cascade Lake server CPU, the benchmark 538.imagick_r from
the SPEC 2017 FPrate suite is 26% slower when built with GCC 12 using
options -Ofast -march=native than when built with GCC 11 with the same
options.
I have bisected the issue to r12-2549-g872da9a6f664a0:
872da9a6f664a06d73c987aa0cb2e5b830158a10 is the first bad commit
commit 872da9a6f664a06d73c987aa0cb2e5b830158a10
Author: liuhongt <hongtao.liu@intel.com>
Date: Fri Mar 26 10:56:47 2021 +0800
Add the member integer_to_sse to processor_cost as a cost simulation for
movd/pinsrd. It will be used to calculate the cost of vec_construct.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR target/99881
* config/i386/i386.h (processor_costs): Add new member
integer_to_sse.
* config/i386/x86-tune-costs.h (ix86_size_cost, i386_cost,
i486_cost, pentium_cost, lakemont_cost, pentiumpro_cost,
geode_cost, k6_cost, athlon_cost, k8_cost, amdfam10_cost,
bdver_cost, znver1_cost, znver2_cost, znver3_cost,
btver1_cost, btver2_cost, btver3_cost, pentium4_cost,
nocona_cost, atom_cost, atom_cost, slm_cost, intel_cost,
generic_cost, core_cost): Initialize integer_to_sse same value
as sse_op.
(skylake_cost): Initialize integer_to_sse twice as much as sse_op.
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_builtin_vectorization_cost):
Use integer_to_sse instead of sse_op to calculate the cost of
vec_construct.
It is very likely that the problem is a load-to-store-forwarding stall
issue and so related to PR 80689 but the commit makes it either more
frequent or much worse.
Sorry for reporting this so late, unfortunately we do not benchmark
this class of CPUs periodically. We do not see the problem on any of
the AMD Zens or Intel Kabylake (client) CPUs.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
[Bug 26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list