[Bug tree-optimization/102513] [10/11/12 Regression] Many false positive warnings with recursive function

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102513

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It is in
      /* Recursively generate lattice values with a limited count.  */
      FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (val_seeds, i, src_val)
        {
          for (int j = 1; j < max_recursive_depth; j++)
            {
              tree cstval = get_val_across_arith_op (opcode, opnd1_type, opnd2,
                                                     src_val, res_type);
              if (!cstval
                  || !ipacp_value_safe_for_type (res_type, cstval))
                break;

              ret |= dest_lat->add_value (cstval, cs, src_val, src_idx,
                                          src_offset, &src_val, j);
              gcc_checking_assert (src_val);
            }
        }
(but there is another spot doing the similar thing) where it would be nice to
also break if cstval is non-NULL and safe for type, but is outside of the value
range.  I have no idea how to get from this spot at that value range though.