[Bug libstdc++/104099] [12 Regression] basic_string(nullptr) constructor should not be present before C++23
cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Tue Jan 18 20:43:54 GMT 2022
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104099
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely <redi@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe3ed885cda5ab920d361b694ee539242052022f
commit r12-6698-gfe3ed885cda5ab920d361b694ee539242052022f
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date: Tue Jan 18 16:26:45 2022 +0000
libstdc++: Limit new basic_string(nullptr_t) constructor to C++23
[PR104099]
The new deleted constructors added by P2166R1 are a breaking change,
making previously valid code ill-formed in C++23. As a result, they
should only be defined for C++23 and not for C++11 and up.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/104099
* include/bits/basic_string.h (basic_string(nullptr_t)): Only
define for C++23.
(operator=(nullptr_t)): Likewise.
* include/bits/cow_string.h: Likewise.
* include/std/string_view (basic_string_view(nullptr_t)):
Likewise.
* testsuite/21_strings/basic_string/cons/char/nullptr.cc: Adjust
expected error. Add examples that become ill-formed in C++23.
* testsuite/21_strings/basic_string_view/cons/char/nonnull.cc:
Adjust expected errors.
* testsuite/21_strings/basic_string_view/cons/wchar_t/nonnull.cc:
Likewise.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list