[Bug sanitizer/88997] Implicit constructors created with line numbers

[jg at jguk dot org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88997

--- Comment #2 from Jonny Grant <jg at jguk dot org> ---

2022-12-26  Jonathan Grant <jg@jguk.org>
        * gcc/doc/extend.texi: Bugzilla 88860 - Clarify online manual
infelicities


>From 8b142ad8973dc67289e197e30966490a944e4819 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonathan Grant <jg@jguk.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 20:58:29 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Bugzilla 88860 - Clarify gcc online manual infelicities

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Grant <jg@jguk.org>
---
 gcc/doc/extend.texi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
index adba057c190..88fc625050b 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
@@ -9190,7 +9190,7 @@ have to optimize it to just @code{return 42 + 42;}.
 This section describes the syntax with which @code{__attribute__} may be
 used, and the constructs to which attribute specifiers bind, for the C
 language.  Some details may vary for C++ and Objective-C@.  Because of
-infelicities in the grammar for attributes, some forms described here
+limitations in the grammar for attributes, some forms described here
 may not be successfully parsed in all cases.

 There are some problems with the semantics of attributes in C++.  For
-- 
2.37.2