[Bug libstdc++/107979] [13 regression] r13-4391-g0ded30b361d2b1 causes excess errors in 17_intro/names.cc on big endian

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107979

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-12-05
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
No need to ignore it, this should work:

--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/names.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/names.cc
@@ -241,6 +241,11 @@
 #undef y
 #endif

+#if defined __GLIBC_PREREQ && ! __GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 19)
+// Glibc defines this prior to 2.19
+#undef __unused
+#endif
+
 #if __has_include(<newlib.h>)
 // newlib's <sys/cdefs.h> defines these as macros.
 #undef __lockable


Interesting that the comment Andrew posted also mentions __block, because we
use that as a variable name in a few places. It hasn't failed so far :-)