[Bug libstdc++/105440] New: c++20: std::string's destructor not a constant expression when it should
janpmoeller at gmx dot de
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sat Apr 30 13:28:52 GMT 2022
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105440
Bug ID: 105440
Summary: c++20: std::string's destructor not a constant
expression when it should
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: janpmoeller at gmx dot de
Target Milestone: ---
The following valid c++20 program fails to compile on both gcc and clang when
compiled with libstdc++:
/************************************************************/
#include <string>
#include <array>
constexpr auto foo(char c){
std::array a{std::string{"foo"} + c};
return true;
}
static_assert(foo('a'));
/************************************************************/
The emitted error is:
/************************************************************/
<source>:9:18: error: non-constant condition for static assertion
9 | static_assert(foo('a'));
| ~~~^~~~~
In file included from
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20220430/include/c++/13.0.0/string:53,
from <source>:1:
<source>:9:18: in 'constexpr' expansion of 'foo(97)'
<source>:7:1: in 'constexpr' expansion of '(&
a)->std::array<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>, 1>::~array()'
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20220430/include/c++/13.0.0/array:99:12: in
'constexpr' expansion of
'<anonymous>->std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>::~basic_string()'
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20220430/include/c++/13.0.0/bits/basic_string.h:795:19:
in 'constexpr' expansion of
'((std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>*)this)->std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>::_M_dispose()'
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20220430/include/c++/13.0.0/bits/basic_string.h:275:26:
error: '((& a) == <anonymous>)' is not a constant expression
275 | { return _M_data() == _M_local_data(); }
| ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1
/************************************************************/
The same program compiles with libc++, and on msvc. Also see the following
godbolt link for comparison:
https://godbolt.org/z/zfn1Pr7P1
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list