[Bug tree-optimization/67196] [9/10/11 Regression] loop-induced false positive from -Wmaybe-uninitialized
msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Wed Mar 31 19:44:36 GMT 2021
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67196
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2015-08-12 00:00:00 |2021-3-31
Known to fail| |10.2.0, 11.0, 5.5.0, 6.4.0,
| |7.2.0, 8.3.0, 9.1.0
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|Another false positive from |[9/10/11 Regression]
|-Wmaybe-uninitialized |loop-induced false positive
| |from -Wmaybe-uninitialized
Keywords| |diagnostic
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Reconfirmed with GCC 11 as a regression introduced in r185913 (4.8.0 20120328).
Nothing in the IL jumps out at me that could be used by the predicate analysis
to rule out the false positive: the use in the return statement in bb 8 looks
unconditional.
pr67196.c: In function ‘test’:
pr67196.c:7:7: warning: ‘first_caption_idx’ may be used uninitialized in this
function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
7 | int first_caption_idx;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
int test (int n)
{
int i;
int first_caption_idx;
int first_caption;
int num_captions_in_row;
int _1;
_Bool _2;
_Bool _3;
_Bool _4;
int _12;
<bb 2> [local count: 118111600]:
if (n_16(D) > 0)
goto <bb 9>; [89.00%]
else
goto <bb 11>; [11.00%]
<bb 11> [local count: 12992276]:
goto <bb 8>; [100.00%]
<bb 9> [local count: 105119324]:
<bb 3> [local count: 955630225]:
# num_captions_in_row_25 = PHI <num_captions_in_row_5(10), 0(9)>
# first_caption_27 = PHI <first_caption_7(10), 0(9)>
# first_caption_idx_29 = PHI <first_caption_idx_9(10),
first_caption_idx_14(D)(9)> <<< (3)
first_caption_idx_14(D) is uninitialized
# i_31 = PHI <i_19(10), 0(9)>
_1 = some_test (i_31);
if (_1 != 0)
goto <bb 4>; [50.00%]
else
goto <bb 12>; [50.00%]
<bb 12> [local count: 477815113]:
goto <bb 5>; [100.00%]
<bb 4> [local count: 477815112]:
num_captions_in_row_18 = num_captions_in_row_25 + 1;
<bb 5> [local count: 955630225]:
# num_captions_in_row_5 = PHI <num_captions_in_row_25(12),
num_captions_in_row_18(4)>
# first_caption_7 = PHI <first_caption_27(12), 1(4)>
# first_caption_idx_9 = PHI <first_caption_idx_29(12), i_31(4)> <<< (2)
i_19 = i_31 + 1;
if (n_16(D) != i_19)
goto <bb 10>; [89.00%]
else
goto <bb 6>; [11.00%]
<bb 10> [local count: 850510901]:
goto <bb 3>; [100.00%]
<bb 6> [local count: 105119324]:
_2 = first_caption_7 != 0;
_3 = num_captions_in_row_5 == 1;
_4 = _2 & _3;
if (_4 != 0)
goto <bb 13>; [38.20%]
else
goto <bb 7>; [61.80%]
<bb 13> [local count: 40157944]:
goto <bb 8>; [100.00%]
<bb 7> [local count: 64961380]:
<bb 8> [local count: 118111600]:
# _12 = PHI <first_caption_idx_9(13), 0(7), 0(11)> <<< (1)
return _12; <<< use
}
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list