[Bug middle-end/101134] Bogus -Wstringop-overflow warning about non-existent overflow

[dangelog at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101134

--- Comment #4 from Giuseppe D'Angelo <dangelog at gmail dot com> ---
Could the warning messages then be changed to point out that the issue is only
a mere possibility? Using an "assertive" wording makes users believe that GCC
has positively and conclusively proved that there's something wrong, whilst
it's exactly the opposite (it didn't prove anything, and it's a false
positive).

Uninitialized warnings have this distinction and warn in two different ("may be
used uninitialized" vs "is used initialized"). If here the distinction cannot
be made, AND false positives are allowed to warn, I'd really prefer the "may be
overflowing" wording than the "is overflowing" existing one.