[Bug target/95095] Feature request: support -fno-unique-section-names

[i at maskray dot me]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95095

--- Comment #3 from Fangrui Song <i at maskray dot me> ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2)
> Can't we use ".text%name" for -ffunction-sections, like we did originally,
> in 1996?  See cf4403481dd6.  This does not conflict with other section
> names, and does not have all the problems you get from doing anything that
> is not a simple prefix.

A function named 'foo' compiles to '.text%foo'? It might have been better to
avoid conflicts with '.text.startup' '.text.hot' etc but now such a change
would just inconvenience users (think of various Linux kernel linker script
fragments).

.text%name does not address -fno-unique-section-names.