[Bug debug/98755] [11 regression] r11-6755 causes failure in g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/constexpr-var-1.C
cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Wed Feb 10 07:02:11 GMT 2021
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98755
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e1782d8ad10dc6b556e118fd25fdaff04ce54dde
commit r11-7162-ge1782d8ad10dc6b556e118fd25fdaff04ce54dde
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Feb 10 07:54:30 2021 +0100
dwarf2out: Don't prune static data members initialized with constants with
-gdwarf-5 [PR98755]
In DWARF4 and earlier, static data members were represented as
DW_TAG_member and the
pruning code wouldn't prune those, but in DWARF5 they are represented as
DW_TAG_variable
with the class parent and the pruning code prunes those by default unless
they are
referenced from a separate definition without the class parent (out of
class definition).
C++17 inline vars have the definitions in the class though and even before
if the static
data member isn't ODR used, it doesn't need to be defined, so we could just
never describe
those static data members in the debug info.
This change stops the pruning of DW_TAG_variable with DW_AT_const_value
attribute
with a class parent for -gdwarf-5 and later.
This fixes
-FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/constexpr-var-1.C scan-assembler-times
DW_AT_const_expr 2
-FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/80276.cc whatis p4
-FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/80276.cc whatis p4
-FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as
-FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as
-FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print os
-FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print os
2021-02-10 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR debug/98755
* dwarf2out.c (prune_unused_types_walk): Mark DW_TAG_variable DIEs
at class scope for DWARF5+.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list