[Bug c++/21678] Using inline disables warnings about missing return statements

[jason at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21678

Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Actually with inline functions we don't reach building the cfg but throw
> away the function early:

I think that's a mistake; we shouldn't throw away the function until after
we've done enough to check for (some?) warnings.  Inline functions usually
aren't big enough for this to make a significant difference to compile time.