[Bug c++/99994] New: internal compiler error: trying to capture 'f' in instantiation of generic lambda within constraints_satisfied_p

ed at catmur dot uk gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Apr 9 12:44:42 GMT 2021


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99994

            Bug ID: 99994
           Summary: internal compiler error: trying to capture 'f' in
                    instantiation of generic lambda within
                    constraints_satisfied_p
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: ed at catmur dot uk
  Target Milestone: ---

In godbolt gcc 11.0.1 20210408:

int main() {
    auto f = [](int) { return true; };
    return [&](auto i) requires (f(sizeof(i))) { return 99; }(12);
}

In substitution of 'template<class auto:1> main()::<lambda(auto:1)> [with
auto:1 = int]':
3:62:   required from here
3:35: internal compiler error: trying to capture 'f' in instantiation of
generic lambda
    3 |     return [&](auto i) requires (f(sizeof(i))) { return 99; }(12);
      |                                 ~~^~~~~~~~~~~~
0x1d00959 internal_error(char const*, ...)
0x800866 add_capture(tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*, bool, bool)
0x800bfa add_default_capture(tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*)
0x73fdda constraints_satisfied_p(tree_node*, tree_node*)
0x955913 fn_type_unification(tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*
const*, unsigned int, tree_node*, unification_kind_t, int, conversion**, bool,
bool)
0x6e2ace build_op_call(tree_node*, vec<tree_node*, va_gc, vl_embed>**, int)
0x981ab5 finish_call_expr(tree_node*, vec<tree_node*, va_gc, vl_embed>**, bool,
bool, int)
0x8e224d c_parse_file()
0xa612e2 c_common_parse_file()

Without the default-capture the program is rejected with

    note: constraints not satisfied
    [...]
    error: 'f' is not captured

which I think is incorrect since `f` is not odr-used; clang and MSVC accept
either way.


More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list