[Bug c++/90212] [8/9/10/11 Regression] by-ref capture of constexpr class object rejected
cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon May 25 22:06:09 GMT 2020
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90212
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
<jason@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aa613a81831bdc044840a95a7a7803a235608503
commit r10-8183-gaa613a81831bdc044840a95a7a7803a235608503
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date: Mon May 25 18:04:39 2020 -0400
c++: constexpr and lambda capture [PR90212]
This is the same issue as PR86429, just in potential_constant_expression_1
rather than cxx_eval_constant_expression. As in that case, when we're
trying to evaluate a constant expression within a lambda, we don't have a
constant closure object to refer to, but we can try to refer directly to
the
captured variable.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog
2020-05-05 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
PR c++/90212
* constexpr.c (potential_constant_expression_1): In a lambda
function, consider a captured variable directly.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list