[Bug c++/94955] [10/11 Regression] ICE in to_wide
cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon May 18 23:06:46 GMT 2020
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94955
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek <mpolacek@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d4e1e144c25e526e4f668be5a0bc10d0c1c738c
commit r11-474-g2d4e1e144c25e526e4f668be5a0bc10d0c1c738c
Author: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Date: Wed May 6 15:53:33 2020 -0400
c++: ICE when shortening right shift [PR94955]
Since r10-6527 fold_for_warn calls maybe_constant_value, which means it
can fold more than it previously could. In this testcase it means that
cp_build_binary_op/RSHIFT_EXPR set short_shift because now we were able
to fold op1 to an INTEGER_CST. But then when actually performing the
shortening we crashed because cp_fold_rvalue wasn't able to fold as much
as f_f_w and so tree_int_cst_sgn crashed on a NOP_EXPR. Therefore the
calls should probably match.
PR c++/94955
* typeck.c (cp_build_binary_op): Use fold_for_warn instead of
cp_fold_rvalue.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-shift2.C: New test.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list