https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79627 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #3) > It is fixed for gcc 10, probably by > g:00a49cd840f60774b0e9e0109fb10559bc9a9194. Yes, it's fixed with this commit.