[Bug target/94383] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on aarch64

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94383

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Is the difference maybe related to the empty field that is added for c++17
mode, mentioned in Bug 89358 comment 12?

Is the aarch64 back end not ignoring that field?