[Bug c++/94326] g++: error: pack.ii: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length)
cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Mar 27 09:05:23 GMT 2020
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94326
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2eea00c518d5a72d0bdbc810ae675e7ad5fee414
commit r10-7411-g2eea00c518d5a72d0bdbc810ae675e7ad5fee414
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Mar 27 10:04:31 2020 +0100
c++: Avoid calls in non-evaluated contexts affect whether function can or
can't throw [PR94326]
The following testcase FAILs -fcompare-debug, because if we emit a
-Wreturn-local-addr warning, we tsubst decltype in order to print the
warning and as that function could throw, set_flags_from_callee during that
sets cp_function_chain->can_throw and later on we don't set TREE_NOTHROW
on foo. While with -w or -Wno-return-local-addr, tsubst isn't called
during
the warning_at, cp_function_chain->can_throw is kept clear and TREE_NOTHROW
is set on foo.
It isn't just a matter of the warning though, in
int foo ();
int bar () { return sizeof (foo ()); }
int baz () { return sizeof (int); }
I don't really see why we should mark only baz as TREE_NOTHROW and not bar
too, when neither can really throw.
2020-03-27 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/94326
* call.c (set_flags_from_callee): Don't update
cp_function_chain->can_throw or current_function_returns_abnormally
if cp_unevaluated_operand.
* g++.dg/other/pr94326.C: New test.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list