[Bug target/94145] Longcalls mis-optimize loading the function address

[segher at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94145

--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
How could the function address ever not be constant?

Hoisting it to somewhere where it is (dynamically) more expensive is a
bad idea, of course.