[Bug c++/95772] warning desired when default operator= cannot be constructued

[marcpawl at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95772

Marc Pawlowsky <marcpawl at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #4 from Marc Pawlowsky <marcpawl at gmail dot com> ---
"Do the default thing" vs "generate the default".  

What would your feeling be for a clang-tidy rule under readability?  It was a
surprise to me, especially since I never have actually read the spec since
C++98, just training articles/videos and quick scans through the odd committee
paper.