[Bug target/95488] Suboptimal multiplication codegen for v16qi
crazylht at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Jun 11 08:11:36 GMT 2020
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95488
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu <crazylht at gmail dot com> ---
Microbenchmark
----
cat test.c
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <x86intrin.h>
typedef char v16qi __attribute__ ((vector_size (16)));
extern v16qi interleave_mul (v16qi, v16qi);
extern v16qi extend_mul (v16qi, v16qi);
#define LOOP 30000000
int
main ()
{
int i;
unsigned long long start, end;
unsigned long long diff;
unsigned int aux;
v16qi *p0;
v16qi *p1;
v16qi x, y;
p0 = (v16qi *) malloc (LOOP * sizeof (*p0));
p1 = (v16qi *) malloc (LOOP * sizeof (*p1));
for (i = 0; i < LOOP; i++)
for (int j = 0; j != 16; j++)
{
p0[i][j] = 1 + i + j;
p1[i][j] = 1 + i * i + j * j;
}
#if 1
start = __rdtscp (&aux);
for (i = 0; i < LOOP; i+=16)
y = interleave_mul (p0[i], p1[i]);
end = __rdtscp (&aux);
diff = end - start;
printf ("interleave_mul : %lld\n", diff);
#endif
#if 1
start = __rdtscp (&aux);
for (i = 0; i < LOOP; i+=16)
x = extend_mul (p0[i], p1[i]);
end = __rdtscp (&aux);
diff = end - start;
printf ("extend_mul : %lld\n", diff);
#endif
free (p0);
free (p1);
return 0;
}
---
show a little bit improvement:
interleave_mul : 104180000
extend_mul : 103922083
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list