[Bug libgcc/96001] aarch64: bti is missing from lse.S when built with branch protection

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96001

--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:315a7e8cca13530d4d3c5b5f39775c7a62877f3d

commit r9-8742-g315a7e8cca13530d4d3c5b5f39775c7a62877f3d
Author: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
Date:   Thu Jul 2 17:11:56 2020 +0100

    aarch64: Fix BTI support in libgcc [PR96001]

    lse.S did not have the GNU property note markup and the BTI c
    instructions that are necessary when it is built with branch
    protection.

    The notes are only added when libgcc is built with branch
    protection, because old linkers mishandle the note (merge
    them incorrectly or emit warnings), the BTI instructions
    are added unconditionally.

    Note: BTI c is only necessary at function entry if the function
    may be called indirectly, currently lse functions are not called
    indirectly, but BTI is added for ABI reasons e.g. to allow
    linkers later to emit stub code with indirect jump.

    2020-07-09  Szabolcs Nagy  <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>

    libgcc/ChangeLog:

            PR target/96001
            * config/aarch64/lse.S: Add BTI marking and related definitions,
            and add BTI c to function entries.

    (cherry picked from commit f0f62fa0320762119446893c67cb52934bc5a05e)