[Bug c++/93169] [10 regression] Variable incorrectly put into readonly section.

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93169

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > > I want to say b<e>::c::c is not a valid constexpr constructor.  Because
> > > b<e>::c's field h's constructor is not constexr.  If that is the case, then
> > > should be accepts invalid code.
> 
> It's a template. If the constructor doesn't meet the requirements of a
> constexpr constructor, then the constexpr specifier is just ignored. So it's
> not invalid.

Oh, ok.  I should really get familiar with all of the newer C++ features; I
have not learned enough about anything past C++03 :).