[Bug c++/92852] [8/9/10 Regression] location references block not in block tree
cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Wed Feb 26 19:25:00 GMT 2020
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92852
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
<jason@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6678d67c4b7471c25130b6c60a9087e02f31179
commit r9-8290-gb6678d67c4b7471c25130b6c60a9087e02f31179
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Feb 26 13:03:23 2020 -0500
c++: Preserve location in maybe_constant_value.
If cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr doesn't change the argument, we really
shouldn't unshare it when we try to fold it again.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog
2020-02-26 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
PR c++/92852
* constexpr.c (maybe_constant_value): Don't unshare if the cached
value is the same as the argument.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list