[Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch to LRA

[olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212

--- Comment #119 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #118)
> Is there anything that currently speaks against switching to LRA by default
> now?

There were a couple of code quality issues, which I would need to dig up and
re-check if it's still an issue.

> 
> I think, it would be a good idea for gcc-11 or even gcc-10 if possible. I
> will report all issues I'm running into since I am constantly monitoring
> package builds on Debian/sh4.

Last time this issue came up, I asked you to re-build all debian with -mlra
enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg00977.html

I'm still waiting for the results.

I've been telling you to turn on LRA for specific cases, but that doesn't mean
it's not gonna have regressions.  So please try using -mlra for *all* packages,
including kernel and let the system boostrap.

Please report your findings in this PR.