[Bug tree-optimization/93767] [8/9/10 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r8-6064

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93767

--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f91aa3e6cb808f8dfc6b45fa135f7583a7549161

commit r10-6732-gf91aa3e6cb808f8dfc6b45fa135f7583a7549161
Author: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Date:   Tue Feb 18 18:06:32 2020 +0000

    vect: Fix offset calculation for -ve strides [PR93767]

    This PR is a regression caused by r256644, which added support for alias
    checks involving variable strides.  One of the changes in that commit
    was to split the access size out of the segment length.  The PR shows
    that I hadn't done that correctly for the handling of negative strides
    in vect_compile_time_alias.  The old code was:

          const_length_a = (-wi::to_poly_wide (segment_length_a)).force_uhwi
();
          offset_a = (offset_a + vect_get_scalar_dr_size (a)) - const_length_a;

    where vect_get_scalar_dr_size (a) was cancelling out the subtraction
    of the access size inherent in "- const_length_a".  Taking the access
    size out of the segment length meant that the addition was no longer
    needed/correct.

    2020-02-19  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandiford@arm.com>

    gcc/
        PR tree-optimization/93767
        * tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_compile_time_alias): Remove the
        access-size bias from the offset calculations for negative strides.

    gcc/testsuite/
        PR tree-optimization/93767
        * gcc.dg/vect/pr93767.c: New test.