[Bug middle-end/71509] Bitfield causes load hit store with larger store than load

[luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71509

luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |linkw at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #13 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #12)
> But it could do just
> 
>   stw r4,0(r3)
> 
> (on LE; and with a rotate first, on BE).

Thanks for the catching, this optimization is not related to load hit store.  I
will investigate why store-merging pass failed to merge the 2 half store.