[Bug c++/90951] [8/9/10 Regression] error initializing a constexpr array of a struct with const member

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90951

--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill <jason@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0712ea6313bc44f9ae8feb235c1b02c92cdd0527

commit r10-6437-g0712ea6313bc44f9ae8feb235c1b02c92cdd0527
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Feb 4 15:54:17 2020 -0500

    c++: Fix constexpr vs. omitted aggregate init.

    Value-initialization is importantly different from {}-initialization for
    this testcase, where the former calls the deleted S constructor and the
    latter initializes S happily.

        PR c++/90951
        * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_array_reference): {}-initialize missing
        elements instead of value-initializing them.