[Bug libstdc++/79700] std::fabsf and std::fabsl missing from <cmath>

[kip at thevertigo dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79700

--- Comment #12 from Kip Warner <kip at thevertigo dot com> ---
I didn't say STL. I said library designers which includes the standard C
runtime. And no, I don't agree with you. Separate names are helpful for greater
certainty. As for std::ceilf existing just for consistency with C, that's
speculative and, in my view doubtful.