[Bug fortran/96839] gfortran thinks common_bits starts a common block

[w.clodius at icloud dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96839

--- Comment #2 from William Clodius <w.clodius at icloud dot com> ---
I think so.

> On Aug 29, 2020, at 8:17 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96839
> 
> Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
> 
>           What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
>           Priority|P3                          |P4
>     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
>   Last reconfirmed|                            |2020-08-29
> 
> --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> With GCC10 and 11 the errors are
> 
> pr96839.f90:47:38:
> 
>   47 |         common_bits = min(self % bits, set2 % bits)
>      |                                      1
> Error: Expected argument list at (1)
> pr96839.f90:57:25:
> 
>   57 |        bits = self % bits
>      |                         1
> Error: Expected argument list at (1)
> pr96839.f90:25:17:
> 
>   25 |         procedure, pass(self) :: bits
>      |                 1
> Error: Procedure 'bits' at (1) has the same name as a component of 'bitset_t'
> 
> With GCC7 to GCC9 the first error is replaced with
> 
> pr96839.f90:47:14:
> 
>   47 |         common_bits = min(self % bits, set2 % bits)
>      |              1
> Error: Syntax error in COMMON statement at (1)
> 
> Could this PR be considered as FIXED?
> 
> -- 
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You reported the bug.