[Bug fortran/96325] Unclassifiable statement with syntax similar to a type-bound procedure call is accepted

[paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325

--- Comment #20 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> ---
I got caught out by mime content blocking - trying again.

Paul

On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 09:26, Paul Richard Thomas <
paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks - this has been pointed out to me already by Dominique d'Humieres.
> I'll fix tonight or tomorrow.
>
> Paul
>
>
> On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 at 23:46, ro at gcc dot gnu.org <
> gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
>>
>> Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
>>
>>            What    |Removed                     |Added
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>                  CC|                            |ro at gcc dot gnu.org
>>
>> --- Comment #18 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
>> (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #16)
>>
>> >     gcc/testsuite/
>> >             PR fortran/96325
>> >             * gfortran.dg/pr96325.f90: New test.
>>
>> The new testcase produces
>>
>> +UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/pr96325.f90   -O0  compilation failed to produce
>> executable
>> +UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/pr96325.f90   -O1  compilation failed to produce
>> executable
>> +UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/pr96325.f90   -O2  compilation failed to produce
>> executable
>> +UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/pr96325.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
>> -funroll-loops
>> -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  compilation failed to produce
>> executable
>> +UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/pr96325.f90   -O3 -g  compilation failed to
>> produce
>> executable
>> +UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/pr96325.f90   -Os  compilation failed to produce
>> executable
>>
>>   everywhere.  It cannot be
>>
>> ! { dg-do run }
>>
>>   when the compilation is expected to fail.
>>
>> --
>> You are receiving this mail because:
>> You are on the CC list for the bug.
>
>
>
> --
> "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" -
> Albert Einstein
>