[Bug c++/94883] New: coroutines: ICE building folly in verify_gimple_stmt, at tree-cfg.c:4959
iains at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Apr 30 12:48:18 GMT 2020
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94883
Bug ID: 94883
Summary: coroutines: ICE building folly in verify_gimple_stmt,
at tree-cfg.c:4959
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 48423
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48423&action=edit
fix under test
The following should compile but produces:
folly-2.C:59:1: internal compiler error: in verify_gimple_stmt, at
tree-cfg.c:4959
The problem here is that target cleanup expressions have been added to the
initialisers for the awaitable (and returns of non-trivial values from
await_suspend() calls. This is because the expansion of the co_await into its
control flow is not apparent to the machinery adding the target cleanup
expressions. The solution being tested is simply to recreate target
expressions as the co_awaits are lowered. Teaching the machinery to handle
walking co_await expressions in different ways at different points (outside the
coroutine transformation) seems overly complex.
===
namespace std {
template <typename a, typename...> struct coroutine_traits : a {};
template <typename = void> struct coroutine_handle;
template <> struct coroutine_handle<> {};
template <typename> struct coroutine_handle : coroutine_handle<> {};
struct b {
bool await_ready();
void await_suspend(coroutine_handle<>);
void await_resume();
};
} // namespace std
template <typename d> auto ab(int ac, d ad) -> decltype(ad.e(ac));
int f;
class h {
class j {
public:
bool await_ready();
void await_suspend(std::coroutine_handle<>);
void await_resume();
};
public:
void get_return_object();
std::b initial_suspend();
j final_suspend();
void unhandled_exception();
template <typename g>
auto await_transform (g c) { return ab(f, c); }
};
template <typename, typename = int> class k {
public:
using promise_type = h;
using i = std::coroutine_handle<>;
class l {
public:
~l();
operator bool();
};
class m {
public:
bool await_ready();
i await_suspend(std::coroutine_handle<>);
l await_resume();
};
class n {
public:
m e(int);
};
n ah();
};
template <typename ai, typename aj, typename ak>
k<aj>
my_coro (k<aj, ak> am, ai) {
if (auto an = co_await am.ah())
;
}
void foo () {
k<int> a;
my_coro (a, [] {});
}
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list