[Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [9/10 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:175

[law at redhat dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91161

Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |law at redhat dot com

--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
Yea, I think a NOTE_INSN_DELETED is valid in that location.  So yea, using
NEXT_INSN is probably wrong and we should be using something else  like
next_nonnote_insn.  My only worry with next_nonnote_insn would be if it skipped
something like a block note.  What would be the implications for the scheduler
if it walked through the various note insns?