[Bug target/89865] [9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c scan-assembler-times \\\\), % 45

[bergner at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89865

Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |segher at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #13 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> Note, the r264897 change to the testcase was clearly bogus, because then the
> testcase is really useless, the intent of the testcase was to check that all
> (but the 8) peepholes did the right thing and there are no RMW cycles, with
> all the loads and stores from RA (that were previously push/pop instead with
> no other %sp changes) that is not tested anymore.

So given Segher's r265398 changed the code generated for
gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c back to what is was before my r264897 change, are you
saying we should just backout my change to the test case so it looks like what
it did before my commit?

So any issues since then are due only to Vlad's r266385?