[Bug other/89635] New: More ANSI SGR codes in diagnostics?
dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Mar 8 15:49:00 GMT 2019
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89635
Bug ID: 89635
Summary: More ANSI SGR codes in diagnostics?
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: dmalcolm at redhat dot com
Reporter: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
In the discussion on my GCC 9 usability blog post, reddit user "evaned" said:
> I wonder how plausible it is to cut out one of the lines in each
> "block" and use ANSI escapes to underline the relevant part of code
> instead of putting in the ~~~~~s on its own line?
(in
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/ayp3gu/usability_improvements_in_gcc_9/ei2n8al/
)
I'm filing this bug to record that idea (possible GCC 10 material).
I wonder if there are other SGR codes that are worth using? Maybe the
strikethrough code for deletion fix-it hints?
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list