[Bug c++/89381] [7/8/9 Regression] Implicit copy constructor cannot be generated after unrelated class definition
jason at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Wed Mar 6 20:29:00 GMT 2019
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89381
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 6 20:28:47 2019
New Revision: 269442
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269442&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/89381 - implicit copy and using-declaration.
Here the used base<int>::operator= gets into the list of foo's bindings for
operator=, but it shouldn't make the copy ctor deleted.
* class.c (classtype_has_move_assign_or_move_ctor_p): Don't consider
op= brought in by a using-declaration.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/implicit16.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/class.c
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list