[Bug tree-optimization/83518] [8/9 Regression] Missing optimization: useless instructions should be dropped
rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Wed Jul 24 07:53:00 GMT 2019
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Steve Ellcey from comment #19)
> Should this defect be reopened? One of the tests that was added is failing
> for me on aarch64.
>
> FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump optimized
> "return 15;"
> FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C -std=gnu++14 scan-tree-dump optimized
> "return 15;"
> FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr83518.C -std=gnu++17 scan-tree-dump optimized
> "return 15;"
It should have been fixed by r273732 (checked with a cc1 cross to aarch64,
albeit on a not clean tree...)
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list