[Bug ipa/88626] __builtin_constant_p should be as cheap as dead code for inlining purposes
glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
Wed Jan 2 11:50:00 GMT 2019
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> The __builtin_constant_p call itself is "free" but whether guarded code is
> "free" isn't easy to determine. I guess what you want is the computation
> of "b" which is only used when it is constant is considered "free"?
Yes. The computation of b should be free, and also the estimated size of the
function should be at most the max of the 2 branches, not the sum, since only
one will remain.
One possible pessimistic definition (I am not saying we should do it, just
trying to define some goal) would be, for the purpose of estimating the size:
replace all __builtin_constant_p with false, simplify/DCE, and look at the size
of the result. Of course we would actually inline the original function with
__builtin_constant_p, the reduced one is only to get an upper bound on the
size, with the assumption that when __builtin_constant_p returns true, things
are always better (smaller & faster).
> Confirmed for that. Not sure how easy to implement though.
Running some modified DCE pass may not be too hard, although doing that just to
improve the size estimation with __builtin_constant_p for inlining might be
Maybe a heuristic that gives a "bonus" for inlining a function that contains
__builtin_constant_p (only if the argument looks like it depends on the
function parameters?) would be easier? I don't know if we have something like
More information about the Gcc-bugs