[Bug middle-end/92825] Unnecesary stack protection in Firefox's LightPixel.

[law at redhat dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92825

Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |law at redhat dot com

--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
I'm pretty sure it's just an oversight.  If an object, regardless of its type,
lives in registers, then the object need not be considered for
stack-protector-strong. 

I think we'll need to clarify a bit at the doc level if you fix this.