[Bug target/71321] [6 Regression] x86: worse code for uint8_t % 10 and / 10
egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Oct 12 23:18:00 GMT 2018
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71321
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #6)
> Author: bernds
> Date: Wed Dec 21 16:45:33 2016
> New Revision: 243861
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243861&root=gcc&view=rev
> Log:
>
> PR target/71321
> * config/i386/i386.md (lea<mode>_general_2b, lea<mode>_general_3b): New
> patterns.
> * config/i386/predicates.md (const123_operand): New.
>
> PR target/71321
> * gcc.target/i386/pr71321.c: New test.
>
>
> Added:
> trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr71321.c
> Modified:
> trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
> trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
> trunk/gcc/config/i386/predicates.md
> trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
Are you still working on a backport for this, Bernd?
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list