[Bug middle-end/65703] -fdefer-pop documentation is confusing

[sandra at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65703

sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've fixed the problem with the wording of the -fno-defer-pop documentation.

The other problem raised in this issue was the difficulty in locating
documentation for the positive form -fdefer-pop.  I'm going to address this in
general by adding an @opindex entry for the positive form of all "no-" options
so searching the document will at least turn up a hit in the index that will
get you to the right place.