[Bug c++/19808] miss a warning about uninitialized member usage in member initializer list in constructor

[lopezibanez at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808

--- Comment #41 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez at gmail dot com> ---
All these cases can be handled perfectly by the FE and there's a patch
above.

Why complicate it by expecting the ME to understand C++ mem-initializer
semantics?