[Bug c++/84850] [8 Regression] -Wclass-memaccess on a memcpy in a copy assignment operator with no nontrivial bases or members

[msebor at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84850

Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I have a patch that handles both pr84851 and pr84850.  I don't view this report
as a regression any more than the other PR.  The warning does what it was
designed to do.  It was just designed to be strict in this case and overly
permissive in the other.